Although not a royalist, I think the UK queen has done very well over
her long reign. The very survival of the institute of monarchy is in no
small part due to her. The money that royalty brings in must more than
make up for the expense of the royal household.
Ours is a constitutional monarchy: although the queen has weekly discussions with the Prime Minister of the day, she in no way influences the day-to-day running of the nation. She does open Parliamentary sessions in her "official" capacity as head of state (The State Opening of Parliament)
I cannot imagine us as a republic with a president. We are lacking people that we could all
look up to and respect. Somehow I cannot imagine the monarchy after
Elizabeth dies. It is bound to happen sooner rather than later. Will we
still have a monarchy 50 years from now?
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label monarchy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label monarchy. Show all posts
Sunday, 12 June 2016
Wednesday, 9 September 2015
Longest reigning monarch
Later today the UK queen will beat Queen Victoria as the longest reigning monarch in British history. I have mixed views on monarchy: it seems to work here (at least with the current queen who is well respected) and I cannot readily think who would be president if we were a republic. Yet somehow the idea of rank and privilege grates on me: why should someone be queen just because her "line" is royal? No, I think our queen has served us well, but I have mixed views on the monarchy as a concept.
UPDATE 1856z: It is official. The present queen is the longest reigning British monarch of all time.
UPDATE 1856z: It is official. The present queen is the longest reigning British monarch of all time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)